The Decline and Fall of the West
I am picking up on today’s post, Sanity and Insanity, from Frank Davis, who is reporting on the EU’s economic suicide to agree to massive CO2 emission cuts. He has also posted a very creepy short segment of an interview with Ted Turner. It all leads to the same conclusion: the one I have been banging on about.
As Frank says, “Have a listen to Ted Turner talking about climate change. It’s only a minute long. And remember that this is the guy who gave $1 billion to the WHO”:
But these people know exactly what they are doing. Turner actually scared me like I was watching a horror film when he started talking about depopulation in such a cold, calculated and factual way.
It’s too many of the saps out here who are mad for not seeing through the charade by now, but they gather their ‘news’ from the likes of Turner’s networks. Turner is probably just a low-grade elite – $1 billion is absolutely nothing. But he knows the endgame: a World government and massive depopulation.
This is why the EU will readily sacrifice our economies and futures. To impoverish us is to empower the elites even further. Labour’s Climate Change Act 2008 committed the UK to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% by 2050 (compared to the 1990 ‘baseline’, which seems a weird way to arrange it) so we have these apparently insane leaders saying and doing crazy things in every country. But they are specially groomed for the job and being drunk with power makes them feel so good that they’ll go along with anything to keep their positions.
It’s the reason that UKIP scares me because the same people run everything popular and because the elites write the script and plan many decades ahead, they know what public opinion will be, so they can arrange the ‘opposition’ before the real opposition gets started.
I vote UKIP in the hope that I’m wrong and that it is so full of ordinary people who believe in freedom and UK sovereignty that they won’t allow the leadership to renege on anything if and when the time comes for them to take the reins of what’s left of the UK.
But the grassroots support of the mainstream parties is at odds with the leaderships, because those leaders are chosen/compromised for their ability to craftily fool the voters. And the people are still stupid. Cameron gave a ‘cast-iron’ guarantee of an EU referendum then gets into Number 10 and imposed a three-line whip on the vote in the Commons to ensure that we didn’t get one then within several months (I think) he’s promising that if the Tories are reelected there will definitely be a referendum in the distant future. And they believe him.
He’s not even charismatic; slightly better than ‘damp rag’ Van Rompuy, but people like comforting lies and the “devil you know” so don’t want change. And a very large minority/small majority will believe anything, like the need to destroy our industry to ‘save the planet’ and these same people probably won’t mind that vast numbers of old folks will die of cold in future winters due to exorbitant prices and intermittent power supplies. Not just old folks either from now on. Whole families will be found dead, their bodies huddled together in their living room in a last-gasp attempt to stay alive after they lost their jobs and the benefits system collapsed – and the forecast of a new ice age was correct!
People can’t add 2 + 2 and get 4 now. They’ll believe any tripe that comes out of the idiot box if it’s said by someone in a suit and a posh accent. They esteem as worthless their own lifetime of experiences and intelligence in favour of what the ‘experts’ trot out to declare imminent disasters of Biblical proportions unless we all ‘tackle’ climate change and the obesity ‘ticking time bomb’ and the smoking ‘epidemic’ and the ‘bigotry’ and the vastly increased threat of war by the existence of sovereign nations, etc.
Turner knows what he’s doing. He’s a lapdog really. Probably trying to suck up to the real elites hoping to dine at the Captain’s table when it’s all over. Not that he’ll likely still be alive then, although they are moving quickly.
They are mad – barking mad – but psychopaths can’t understand that. And the masses have also lost their mind on too much bread and circuses provided by the likes of Turner and his ‘entertainment’.
But people never change. Juvenal (from whom we get ‘bread and circuses’) warned the ancient Romans that they were losing their duty to hold their leaders to account. E.g. in Rome they had a grain dole – free grain for the Romans and expensive entertainment laid on to keep the natives satisfied enough not to bother revolting. Seems it’s exactly the same in the West today.
In its review of Edward Gibbon’s “The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”, one sentence in Wikipedia perhaps sums up why the empire collapsed:
According to Gibbon, the Roman Empire succumbed to barbarian invasions in large part due to the gradual loss of civic virtue among its citizens.
A case of déjà vu.
Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
There are several American (and one very important Canadian – the Agenda 21 man) billionaires who believe in this stuff – and they really believe in it (and put millions of Dollars into it). Warren Buffett is a con man (he just wants to profit from government intervention – as he has so often in the past), but the others are sincere (which makes them more, not less, dangerous). However, they are less important than the EDUCATION SYSTEM – which is dominated by leftist ideas.
Take the example of Germany – famous for its family owned manufacturing industry. The German government (at the urging of the media – which is, in turn, following what they are taught by the schools and universities) is undermining German industry – with massive tax and regulation attacks on the price of energy and so on (and threats of inheritance tax and …..).
“But Paul they may be correct about global warming” – then why are they (the German government) CLOSING DOWN (not deregulating – in order to air the expansion of) the nuclear power industry? This is NOT about reducing C02 – they (the German government – of all major political parities) is cold bloodedly undermining Germany – more regulations, “free” university education (to spread the insane ideology). more taxes and regulations on energy, CLOSING DOWN nuclear power (and on and on).
This can not be blamed on American and Canadian billionaires (although some of them are evil) it is an international DEATH CULT – the suicide of the West.
In every Western country (bar Israel – which many on this site do not consider a Western country) the fertility rate is actually negative – fewer than two births per woman. So much for the “population crises” – there is one, but in the exact opposite way than Mr Ted Turner claims (see Germany and Japan, and Italy and ….. for the real crises).
There is also no serious effort to keep out intruders who are NOT “immigrants” in the traditional sense, They do not come to (for example) Britain or the United States to join the national culture and show their love for a nation they wish to join – they come to destroy (replace) it (“immigrant” is not the correct word for such people). That is not a matter of “race” (the former Bishop of Rochester is a brown man who was born and brought up in Pakistan – he is BRITISH), and everything to do with cultural rejection, and national rejection (if you go to live in a nation you should want to join that nation – if you want to replace that nation with something else, then “immigrant” is not the correct word to describe you).
In every Western country (again bar Israel) the national military is being slashed – and national independence is being thrown away by international treaties handing over power to multi national (indeed often world) entities
The objective is obvious – that where ever someone goes the same PC taxes and regulations will be imposed (good luck trying that with China – it is just the West that will accept this insanity).
The West is destroying itself – it is indeed the “decline and fall of the West”.
And the true core of the Death Cult ideology that is destroying the West is the education system – the schools and universities.
It is the decline and fall of the West, it is not a sincere concern about C02 emissions – the attacks on the nuclear industry (not just in the United States, but all over the West) prove this.
We face a Death Cult – and one with an iron grip on most of the schools and universities.
Evil exists but has always been defeated by good.Satan V Christ perhaps.E.g. Indocrinnated superior Nazi race? Now we have the indoctrinated elete Muslims who are evil.Does good exist?
Quoted from the comment above:
“There is also no serious effort to keep out intruders who are NOT “immigrants” in the traditional sense, They do not come to (for example) Britain or the United States to join the national culture and show their love for a nation they wish to join – they come to destroy (replace) it (“immigrant” is not the correct word for such people). That is not a matter of “race” (the former Bishop of Rochester is a brown man who was born and brought up in Pakistan – he is BRITISH), and everything to do with cultural rejection, and national rejection (if you go to live in a nation you should want to join that nation – if you want to replace that nation with something else, then “immigrant” is not the correct word to describe you).”
In your opinion it is not about race. To others it is entirely about race though, because race and ethnocentricity is a dynamic that is very important to what a nation actually is and how it operates.
White people take it for granted that things will just carry on as normal without them being present – and seem to not care about being a despised minority when the balance tips, because they fool themselves that it is not a problem or will not be a problem, probably because they are so foolish to believe that their liberal tolerance will be embedded in society and duly reciprocated at such a point.
This is especially the case for libertarians and their strong sense of individualism that tends to completely disregard and conveniently ignore group identities and group dynamics that exist in the world. Time and time again these vitally important ingredients to life and humanity itself are put aside in favour of idealism of how an individualist society ought to operate, with everybody just doing their own thing.
People often cite America and other places as successful “proposition nations” or “civic nationalism” where “anybody can be American” and that there is this great “Melting Pot” that holds America together – but they are clearly not paying attention to what is actually happening, or to what is happening in all the other places where this artificial situation has been imposed, or indeed to history when it comes to partitions, wars, all heaps of trouble and the erasure of civilisations and peoples.
There are racial differences between groups – and it matters, no much how much people want to pretend it doesn’t. When it comes to ethnocentricity, it is white people who come at the bottom of the ladder. There is very little solidarity or sense of racial identity when compared to others.
This is perhaps why (for example) in the United States we have the hysteria over Ferguson – black people all over America and all over the world are interested only because it involved another black person and ‘black people’.
Otherwise, why would they care? What has it got to do with them? Nothing. They see who are ‘their own’ and who are not. They see they have collective identity, collective vested interests and collective issues and objectives. Nobody criticises them for this, or really recognises such dynamics going on.
Yet whenever white people look out for their own interests and even their very survival as a racial group, they are treated as nothing, as nobodies, as their issues being illegitimate, that our lands and cultures and institutions are blank canvasses that anybody can come and paint on.
The comment quoted above is typically schizophrenic in content to me, because on the one hand it seems to talk about destruction and replacement by immigration – then towards the end suggests that ‘replacement’ of white people with brown and black people is not actually a replacement of anything of note at all – as long as they hold on to particular values or whatever, like the random and rare example of a one time Pakistani Christian Bishop.
Nobody in their right mind could object to a random well integrated Pakistani here and there. Maybe one Asian in 500,000, scattered randomly around the nation where, after a few hundred years, the descendants would be indistinguishable from the indigenous population. But this is not what is happening is it?
The notion that those with the sharpest elbows will not nudge other groups out of the way when they hold the sway of numbers and powers is ridiculous to me. The Bishop may well fit in like a glove, but what about his children, or their children? When they are part of the majority Pakistani population in Birmingham or Blackburn or Luton, perhaps Muslim instead of Christian too, how will their loyalties be pulled when they see injustices to the remaining minority whites?
I find the displayed attitude of indifference to the survival and continuance of the indigenous / Caucasian British people by those such as Mr Marks to be pretty disgusting and disturbing. It is the kind of attitude that is allowing this genocidal process to continue.
Racial replacement of a people in their own country IS a matter of significance, it IS a matter of importance, it WILL shape how this country will operate in the future, it IS a travesty, it IS a programme of slow genocide and it matters not whether a random Pakistani bishop is bucking a trend or not in behaviour and outlook in the meantime, or whether there might be a tiny handful of “uncle tom” Black’s in American conservative movements – which is the other example usually wheeled out to excuse and trivialise what is really taking place.
As for: “The West is destroying itself – it is indeed the “decline and fall of the West…And the true core of the Death Cult ideology that is destroying the West is the education system – the schools and universities”.
The west may be well destroying itself – but they are the mere wrecking ball on the end of the crane’s chain. Who put the crane there? Who released the ball?
Who disproportionately radicalised and burrowed into the education system and universities? Who disproportionately devised the ‘death cult’ theories and agendas that these professors are said to passively teach? Who disproportionately encouraged changes in laws and immigration policies to create this situation (for their own interests) and prevent people speaking about it?
It is all well and good pointing to the wrecking ball itself and the momentum and damage it is doing at its own devices, which is without any question at all – but ignoring or sidestepping the reasons why the ball is in motion (and who let it rip through the buildings of our civilisation and our peoples in the first place) is in my view something which covers up for the crime and the criminals.
Concerned Briton.
It is indeed a profound disagreement.
You believe that culture is, fundamentally, about biological race – and I do not.
The “joke” is that I regularly get accused of being a “racist” (I think they mean “racialist”), when (as you have just pointed out), actually I am not.
I believe that anyone who concerned about culture and fears for a culture being replaced by another, is going to get called a “racist”. I am used to the charge now.
I have set out my position above, and I believe that race is a factor which shapes a society and a factor which is important.
Therefore I do not find it trivial, as you seem to suggest. So trivial do you seem to find it in fact, that you are of the opinion there would be no change (and no real loss) if all the white people were replaced, forever, with brown and black people.
On this basis, the only people I think you can be accused of being racist against are white people – seeing you care not whether they survive or not, particularly in their own homelands.
Although I do believe firmly (and rationally) that a people make a culture – and a culture does not make a people – at no point did I suggest that race and culture are synonymous. I suggest that different races build and sustain different kinds of cultures that suit those groups which create it.
Culture in terms of fashions, music, politics, heroes and villains is something that, within the confines of a people, can change over time and is something that is always changing.
All of that kind of thing is therefore of secondary importance to me than the survival of indigenous Britons in Britain and Caucasian people in Europe and the Occident.
For you, however, it seems that it is this kind of “culture”, “rules”, “viewpoints” or “customs” etc that makes ‘a people’ – and therefore white people can be made into minorities and ultimately vanish from the earth with no real loss or detriment providing these things are carried forward (to some degree or another) by their replacements.
On this issue, like many other people, I suspect that you feel you have the moral high ground and that views to the contrary are somehow nasty, mean spirited, delusional, misinformed, uncharitable, needlessly upsetting, even dangerous and something that ought to be stopped because it can lead to ‘hate’ and violence, whereas the hate and violence is actually borne out of the ingredients that people are shoving into the ‘melting pot’ with their “open minded” “good intentions”.
As a libertarian I am sure you’d think they have the right to express such views, but when the chips are down you’d probably be one of those in the queue to make sure that white people cannot put into place measures to survive and to be dominant in their own homelands.
On this, I would therefore probably bracket you in the softer edge of the ‘anti-white’ and ‘proponent of genocide’ category, because you have, or are complicit to, racial-nihilistic tendencies and agendas which are the bidding of globalism and interchangeability. If not actively, then passively or through indifference.
You see, you seem to be quite happy with advocating this future so long as you can have those ‘integrated’ Pakistani bishops, Jamaican ‘post office masters’ – people who are perhaps waving flags at a Royal wedding and so on and so forth (or people otherwise being superficially contemporary “British” in the short to medium term) whilst society evolves and comes to ultimately reflect the ways of the newer inhabitants.
Myself, I see the gradual replacement of my race (and it’s ultimate destruction) something which is abhorrent and immoral – and something which ought to be prevented.
It is not about hate, it is not about bigotry, it is not about prejudice, it is not about superiority or inferiority. It is about survival, it is about securing the conditions for survival, it is about the ability to have the ingredients that lead to liberty, freedom, harmony, peace and security.
Multiracial and multicultural societies are clearly and evidentially counter-productive to these things, and are situations which imperils the future of the indigenous peoples of Europe, to boot.
I do not and will not accept that it is immoral, unsavoury or unreasonable to counter this situation or to counter the views of those people such as yourself who tend to see us as nothing and of no intrinsic value.
Just as a general point, it seems to me that on current trends, we are heading for being a society in which caste is denoted by skin colour. We will be a society where the higher up the privilege scale one goes, the whiter the skin is, with a basically white ruling class and a brown, mongrelised lower class who serve them. I don’t like the idea of that future one little bit.
I admit to these days having abandoned all my youthful internationalism and having turned into a racist. I would prefer that England had remained a country of overwhelmingly native, white population, and I believe that the potential for a liberal society within that context would have been much higher, and I believe that that is one reason that the authoritarian forces (call them Puritans or Cultural Marxists or Socialists or Progressives, whatever) have adopted the mass immigration policy. It is already too late to have that- it was a possible now that did not happen, but I wish it had.
I think that in future, this period will be looked back upon with considerable regret.
Ian – Kettering (a fairly typical town) seems largely “white” to me. Where are all these black and brown people to whom you refer?
As for immigrants – the Eastern European immigrants are as “white” (pinkish grey) as anyone else.