The next one is what happens if you have full regulator, about 50% cut-off, and a too-thin fire:-
Discover more from The Libertarian Alliance
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The next one is what happens if you have full regulator, about 50% cut-off, and a too-thin fire:-
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I thought objectivists didn’t like being called libertarians? Or was that just their spirit mother?
Perhaps I should have said “Randians”, to be more specific. But I was in a hurry.
Great trains!
As a kid, I used to watch from my bedroom as the Golden Arrow sped past atop the embankment track.
I wondered if the embankment could be internally excavated, with a “hinge-down” section of track which would enable the Golden Arrow to be annexed… >:-}
BTW: The terms “Randian” and “Objectivist libertarian” are mutually exclusive…
I thought they were the same.
I have been going on about Randian Objectivists for years….and you never stopped me!
But, who cares anyway? We’re all libertarian. not like the bloody f*****g Gramsco-Marxians, who’d kill each other as soon as kill any of us.
Dave:
Before you (or anyone else!) posts another word on this subject. read David Ramsay Steele’s fine review “Alice In Wonderland”: save yourselves a whole world of grief…
http://www.la-articles.org.uk/LA-9.pdf
Rand was a fine Romantic novelist and writer of screenplays: it may occur to you, that “Romantic” is the exact opposite of “Objectivis.”
[ FX: “Some men see things as they are, and ask ‘Why?’ But I saw things that never were, and asked “Why not?” — Aeschylus ]
Best,
Tony