Ukrainian Immigration

Daniel Jupp

From what I can find in an admittedly brief search, the black population of Ukraine is less than half a percent.

Every picture I have seen of Ukrainian refugees so far would suggest that it’s about 60%.

Either all the footage of Ukrainian refugees is from a Netflix programme about the Anglo-Saxons, or once again mass immigration is being used to radically alter the demographics of the West.

There comes a point where even those of us who consider every patriot a brother or a sister, and respect black conservatives far more than we do white globalists, must consider this mass immigration into the West both deliberate and malign.

There was no reason for the sponsoring of mass immigration to be the accepted reaction to every war. There are no historic ties between the U.K. and the Ukraine. There are no shared cultural values with either white Ukrainians or black ones, or with people from sub-Saharan Africa pretending to be Ukrainians. To be fair, nor is there with any western nation doing this to their own people. The Irish for example fought for centuries against the English, with whom they shared centuries of interaction both positive and negative. It is somewhat perverse of them to then accept mass immigration affecting radical demographic changes that they once planted bombs to avoid.

And yet Irish nationalists, like English Conservatives, are enthusiastically committed to the complete replacement of their native populace. Presumably they imagine that there exists a great thirst in Sub Saharan Africa to learn Gaelic and songs about people called Danny.
Anyone rational knows that immigration only works in measured quantities that do not threaten radical change. This is the only way people integrate in a beneficial way to them and to the place they join. If you keep pouring numbers in, with no limit, no wisdom and no restraint, then you drown out everything good that anyone could have shared in the first place. You create a rising tide of disconnection and disloyalty, from both arrivals who feel like conquerors, and from natives who feel like slaves. You ensure that there is no reason for others to adapt to the nation they join, and no reason for those already present to love the nation that continually betrays them by placing, every single time, the interests of the stranger above the interests of those who have lived and worked and loved in this particular place for generations.

This is not to wish harm on others, anymore than not offering your child’s bed to a man you don’t know for him to share at night wishes harm upon that man. You have a duty to protect your own before others. It is the most natural thing in the world. If you have no compassion for them, then your alleged compassion for strangers is not itself real, but merely allows free play to your contempt for your own people and their protection.

Nobody was ever asked if they wanted this. Nobody. And yet the consequences of such policies are enormous, and obvious. There are things which no individual government should be allowed to do to their own people. Sponsoring mass immigration is one of those things.