David Davis
From Mark Wadsworth, we now learn that quangos welcome the creation of more quangos, since each one, which is substantively a mouth coupled to an anus, can therefore contribute to the collective destruction of privately-created wealth – which is to say all of the stuff.
The issue I have here is not what to do about quangos, which is clear (close the offices, auction the leases as a sideline near car-dealers, car-boot the seized chattels, and execute the captured and SOHO-connected inmates.)
The Libertarian Issue which has escaped too much discussion is why there is a very very large supply of people willing to
(a) work for or be involved with quangos,
(b) believe that this is a noble, good and right thing to do,
(c) [willing to] have been educated/trained/influenced while students, to believe this Gramscian corruption. It’s not shit – it’s not “nonsense” – it’s not “political correctness gone mad” – NEVER NEVER EVER USE THAT PHRASE !!!!!!!! EVER! Hear me ??? – it’s pure and deliberately pre-meditated evil…..so why did they choose it, when the alternative was “good”?
(d) Worse, why did “academics” exist who could “train” them?
We need to ask why people think quangoism is good.
We need a new word for quangos, which could be used to lynch the concept. Ideas please!